Join our subscribers list to get the latest news, updates and special offers directly in your inbox
The purpose of this article is not to belittle BNP’s victory in the 2026 election. The purpose is to peel the layers of statistics to get to the ground truth and what we can infer from them with reasonable confidence.
One institution will carry three kinds of weight at once: The grief of a country that has buried its young; the fragile hope that it can still build rules stronger than instinct; and the scrutiny of a world deciding what kind of Bangladesh it must now learn to live with.
This government came to power with a democratic mandate. But it risks squandering it. City administrations must look neutral. International crimes prosecutions must feel independent. And the central bank must signal credibility beyond politics.
When it comes to the central bank governor, optics are everything. If he is perceived to be the government's man, then no one will have the necessary faith in him, and he will fail before he even starts.
You cannot have a stable nation where the youth are unemployed and the factories are silent. Stability built on silence is an illusion.
If the BNP's goal had been to signal to the Bangladeshi people that everything their adversaries say about them is true, that nothing has changed from the time they were last in office 20 years ago, that they remain exactly the same party of cronyism, corruption, and contempt for public opinion, they could not have done a better job.
The immediate challenge before Prime Minister Tarique Rahman is to slow down the gyration of the turning wheel and to set us on a straight path. To assess such possibilities we need to clearly understand the political lessons from the recent elections and to explore the pitfalls which lie ahead.
Keeping interest rates artificially low is a recipe for disaster. We have been here before -- not even too long ago -- and we know how this story ends. It won't be pleasant for anyone, least of all the newly-elected government.
The central question is no longer whether knowledge matters. It is who governs its movement, who benefits from its creation, and whether emerging economies will remain sites of extraction in a global knowledge marketplace or become sovereign producers within it.
Jamaat’s political ecosystem has long been associated, at least in public discourse, with moral policing and deeply conservative positions on women’s roles. It would represent a significant social shift if large numbers of women, especially younger ones who have faced online and offline harassment from JIB affiliated groups, were now turning toward the party.
A two-thirds parliamentary majority means nothing if the streets of Dhaka turn against you, as Sheikh Hasina learned. If Tarique governs with the same composure and restraint he has shown since his return, there is reason for hope. If he does not, the verdict of the streets will be swift.
Who is the Facebook or Instagram of this era? Which AI platforms are being deployed into children’s bedrooms, classrooms and social lives without full transparency about internal research? Which companies are already measuring how certain prompts, filters or recommendation engines affect adolescent self-image, loneliness, or compulsive use?
If Bangladesh treats artificial intelligence simply as another digital tool, it risks falling behind in a world where advantage increasingly rests on capability and commodified intelligence rather than labour alone.
Calling it fascism narrows our field of vision. It directs us toward interwar Europe -- uniforms, total mobilization, ideological conquest -- when our own trajectory resembles something different.
In the final analysis, a truly elected government is powerful not because it controls the state machinery, but because it commands the consent of the governed. That consent, however, is not permanent; it must be earned every day through performance, integrity, and humility.
The Epstein files test a basic democratic claim: That no one is above the law. If the outcome is curated transparency, where victims are exposed and the influential are obscured, the test will have been failed. If the outcome is a victim-centred process, the files might finally serve the purpose they were invoked to serve
Total Vote: 45
Short-form videos
Total Vote: 56
Traffic jam
Total Vote: 50
Gen Alpha
Total Vote: 45
Yes, urgently
Total Vote: 41
Argentina national football team vs Brazil national football team
Total Vote: 55
Facebook
Total Vote: 57
Mental health
Total Vote: 75
Yes, completely
Total Vote: 67
Russia-Ukraine War
Total Vote: 68
Japan
Total Vote: 65
Politics
Total Vote: 67
Cricket
Total Vote: 76
Yes
Total Vote: 78
Donald Trump
Total Vote: 73
Yes
Total Vote: 65
Brazil
Total Vote: 86
Inflation
Total Vote: 207
A good decision
Total Vote: 224
YES
Total Vote: 249
YES
Total Vote: 365
Yes, he’ll finally take the charge
Total Vote: 356
Yes
Total Vote: 425
Yes
Total Vote: 345
On the day of the General Election
Total Vote: 357
YES
Total Vote: 319
A correct, principled decision. They should not sign.
Total Vote: 338
A vital, democratic reset
Total Vote: 449
BNP
Total Vote: 336
December 2025
Total Vote: 313
AI can improve transparency
Total Vote: 343
Yes
Total Vote: 657
Yes
Total Vote: 536
As soon as possible