<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>Counterpoint &#45; Khan Khalid Adnan</title>
<link>https://counterpointbd.com/rss/author/khan-khalid-adnan</link>
<description>Counterpoint &#45; Khan Khalid Adnan</description>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Copyright 2025 counterpoint&#45; All Rights Reserved.</dc:rights>

<item>
<title>The July Order Cannot Live Outside the Constitution</title>
<link>https://counterpointbd.com/Live-Outside-the-Constitution</link>
<guid>https://counterpointbd.com/Live-Outside-the-Constitution</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There is a sensible way out, and it lies inside the Constitution, not outside it. If the new government wants to preserve the Reform Council model, it should table a constitutional amendment under Article 142 defining the Council’s status, powers, voting threshold, relation to Parliament, and oath. ]]></description>
<enclosure url="https://counterpointbd.com/uploads/images/202603/image_870x580_69ba3ef39330a.jpg" length="342613" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:16:32 +0600</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Khan Khalid Adnan</dc:creator>
<media:keywords>Interim Government, Referendum, Reform, July Charter</media:keywords>
</item>

<item>
<title>Epstein, Redactions, and the Theatre of Accountability</title>
<link>https://counterpointbd.com/epstein-redactions-and-the-theatre-of-accountability</link>
<guid>https://counterpointbd.com/epstein-redactions-and-the-theatre-of-accountability</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The Epstein files test a basic democratic claim: That no one is above the law. If the outcome is curated transparency, where victims are exposed and the influential are obscured, the test will have been failed. If the outcome is a victim-centred process, the files might finally serve the purpose they were invoked to serve ]]></description>
<enclosure url="https://counterpointbd.com/uploads/images/202602/image_870x580_6996b086d671f.jpg" length="58646" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 12:35:53 +0600</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Khan Khalid Adnan</dc:creator>
<media:keywords>Epstein, law, accountability</media:keywords>
</item>

<item>
<title>Minneapolis, ICE, and the Drift Toward Immigration Policing by Force</title>
<link>https://counterpointbd.com/Minneapolis%2C-ICE%2C-and-the-Drift-Toward-Immigration-Policing-by-Force</link>
<guid>https://counterpointbd.com/Minneapolis%2C-ICE%2C-and-the-Drift-Toward-Immigration-Policing-by-Force</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The constitutional stakes are plain. The Bill of Rights protects speech, press, and the right “peaceably to assemble,” and it does not contain an immigration exception. International law says the same with sharper vocabulary. ]]></description>
<enclosure url="https://counterpointbd.com/uploads/images/202602/image_870x580_697ee6c7eb935.jpg" length="97343" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 11:39:00 +0600</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Khan Khalid Adnan</dc:creator>
<media:keywords>Maura Healey, Trump, ICE</media:keywords>
</item>

<item>
<title>The UN Charter Is Not an Arrest Warrant</title>
<link>https://counterpointbd.com/The-UN-Charter</link>
<guid>https://counterpointbd.com/The-UN-Charter</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Normalizing forced extractions in the name of justice does not advance accountability; it advertises that power can dispense with law ]]></description>
<enclosure url="https://counterpointbd.com/uploads/images/202601/image_870x580_696773c649b5a.jpg" length="59713" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 12:41:04 +0600</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Khan Khalid Adnan</dc:creator>
<media:keywords>Self-defense, Retaliation, Jurisdiction</media:keywords>
</item>

<item>
<title>Should Former IGP Mamun Walk?</title>
<link>https://counterpointbd.com/Can-an-Approver-Still-Be-an-Accused</link>
<guid>https://counterpointbd.com/Can-an-Approver-Still-Be-an-Accused</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Can an Approver still be an accused in the Hasina case? It is difficult to defend the proposition that a person who has been formally pardoned, can remain in law an accused for the same conduct. ]]></description>
<enclosure url="https://counterpointbd.com/uploads/images/202511/image_870x580_692c07cb03813.jpg" length="53610" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:46:05 +0600</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Khan Khalid Adnan</dc:creator>
<media:keywords>ICT, Sheikh Hasina, Death Penalty</media:keywords>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>